feat: drop bincode entirely - #426
Open
alejandro-vaz wants to merge 8 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
ready for review |
alejandro-vaz
changed the title
emilio
reviewed
Aug 21, 2026
| # It is not intended for manual editing. | ||
| version = 4 | ||
|
|
||
| [[package]] |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This actually removes one dep and adds a lot more? Seems unfortunate?
Contributor
Author
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vaz <alejandro.vaz.myt@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
oh no, this comes from failed CI at #396 clap requires edition 2024 |
Contributor
Author
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vaz <alejandro.vaz.myt@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bincodeentirely (Drop bincode support entirely for smallvec 2.0 #398)Cargo.tomlinclude => excludeto make exclusions explicitbincode drop
replaced test with
serde_jsoninsteadfor the future: #428