Skip to content

docs: tell the name's story — a relay that cannot testify - #115

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
114-name-lore
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

docs: tell the name's story — a relay that cannot testify#115
frahlg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
114-name-lore

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The name has had a good rationale since docs/naming.md locked it on
2026-06-08, and none of it reached a reader of the product. This tells the
story in three places and stops there.

README.md — a short "Why the name?" section, sized like the "Is it 'P2P
tmux'?" one, placed after the five claims and before the security screen, so
the name lands as the summary of claim 2. One sentence of the Shakespeare
layer for warmth; no theme built on it, and no component renamed.

SECURITY.md — the rendezvous-relay section now opens with "A relay that
cannot testify" and two sentences of the idea, then the existing technical
content follows unchanged. The claim is bounded to terminal plaintext on
purpose: the same paragraph repeats that the relay still sees the metadata
listed below it, still holds encrypted registry blobs while an agent is live,
and still persists owner-signed revocation tombstones. No "the relay stores
nothing" — that overclaim was caught once already in #108. Headings are
untouched, so SECURITY.md#components-and-trust still resolves.

docs/naming.md — a status note recording where the story now ships, so the
file stays the source rather than the only home. Existing content kept.

Documentation only. No CLI output changes, no code. ## Install is untouched,
so the web/test/empty-state.test.js pin against INSTALL_CMD still holds.

cd go && go test ./... and cd web && npm test both green (167 web tests).

The branch keeps the 114- prefix it was cut with, but this does not close
#114 — that one is about mir-signal reading as Signal the messenger.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01KeiotDVE94wEzvc7wcvm1y


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only edits with no runtime, crypto, or install-path changes.

Overview
This PR ships the existing Miranda naming rationale from internal docs into reader-facing material—no code or CLI changes.

README gains a "Why the name?" section (after the five claims, before the security screen): the Miranda warning as “the relay cannot testify” about keystrokes, plus one Tempest line for tone.

SECURITY.md’s rendezvous-relay section now opens with that same framing (“a relay that cannot testify”), then the prior technical bullets follow unchanged. The new copy is explicitly bounded—plaintext only; metadata, encrypted registry blobs, and revocation tombstones are still called out so it does not overclaim “the relay stores nothing.”

docs/naming.md records where the story now lives (README + SECURITY only); it remains the full source record.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 23fc859. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

The rationale for the name has been locked in docs/naming.md since
2026-06-08 and appeared nowhere a user would see it. Tell it in three
places, and no more:

- README.md gains a short "Why the name?" section next to the security
  screen, with one line of the Shakespeare layer;
- SECURITY.md opens the rendezvous-relay section with the claim it
  earns — the relay cannot testify to terminal plaintext, while the
  metadata, registry blobs, and revocation tombstones it does hold stay
  spelled out unchanged;
- docs/naming.md records where the story now ships, so it stays the
  source rather than the only home.

Documentation only: no CLI output, no code, no new claims.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KeiotDVE94wEzvc7wcvm1y
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-31T05:33:31.513981Z 23fc859 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved. Cursor Bugbot completed with no findings that need human review, and no approval policy requires extra review. No reviewers assigned.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Router and Approver

@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 6d4c0ba into main Aug 31, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant