Skip to content

docs: add section about in transit encryption - #740

Merged
sweb merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/in-transit-encryption
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

docs: add section about in transit encryption#740
sweb merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/in-transit-encryption

Conversation

@sweb

@sweb sweb commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Docs section about in-transit encryption options and aconfiguration

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

Author

  • Changes are OpenShift compatible
  • CRD changes approved
  • CRD documentation for all fields, following the style guide.
  • Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
  • Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
  • Changes need to be "offline" compatible
  • Links to generated (nightly) docs added
  • Release note snippet added

Reviewer

  • Code contains useful comments
  • Code contains useful logging statements
  • (Integration-)Test cases added
  • Documentation added or updated. Follows the style guide.
  • Changelog updated
  • Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)

Acceptance

  • Feature Tracker has been updated
  • Proper release label has been added
  • Links to generated (nightly) docs added
  • Release note snippet added
  • Add type/deprecation label & add to the deprecation schedule
  • Add type/experimental label & add to the experimental features tracker

@sweb sweb moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Jul 31, 2026
@sbernauer
sbernauer self-requested a review July 31, 2026 08:01
@sbernauer sbernauer moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering Jul 31, 2026

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the new docs! WDYT of adding the full example as an kuttl test so we notice once it breaks?

Comment thread docs/modules/spark-k8s/partials/nav.adoc Outdated
Comment thread docs/modules/spark-k8s/pages/usage-guide/encryption-in-transit.adoc Outdated
@sweb

sweb commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I like the new docs! WDYT of adding the full example as an kuttl test so we notice once it breaks?

kuttl test in e5129c4

One thing to note here: The test only "works" with the Spark entrypoint fix - because we check app status and on 26.7 images it will always succeed, so that is not informative. We can check log outputs but since the fix is already in main, I refrained from that.

sbernauer
sbernauer previously approved these changes Aug 3, 2026

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread tests/test-definition.yaml Outdated
Comment thread docs/modules/spark-k8s/partials/nav.adoc Outdated
Comment thread docs/modules/spark-k8s/pages/usage-guide/encryption-in-transit.adoc Outdated

@sbernauer sbernauer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this and the test!

@sweb
sweb added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7b48f5b Aug 4, 2026
18 checks passed
@sweb
sweb deleted the docs/in-transit-encryption branch August 4, 2026 08:49
@sbernauer sbernauer moved this from Development: In Review to Development: Done in Stackable Engineering Aug 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Development: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants