Skip to content

fix(deps): refactor RustCrypto crates package configuration - #14037

Merged
cakebaker merged 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:hashes-default-features
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): refactor RustCrypto crates package configuration#14037
cakebaker merged 1 commit into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:hashes-default-features

Conversation

@xtqqczze

@xtqqczze xtqqczze commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Drop the unused transitive const-oid dependency.

@xtqqczze
xtqqczze marked this pull request as draft August 20, 2026 12:06
@xtqqczze
xtqqczze marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 12:06
@xtqqczze
xtqqczze force-pushed the hashes-default-features branch from e56313b to 37de0e0 Compare August 20, 2026 12:06
@xtqqczze
xtqqczze force-pushed the hashes-default-features branch from 37de0e0 to f33a4c5 Compare August 20, 2026 12:07
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Binary size comparison:

Individual binary size comparison VS main (threshold: >=5% AND >=4 KB).

Total size of compared binaries: 151.59 MB (+4.90 MB, +3.34%)

Significant per-binary changes:
  ls      2.10 MB ->    3.28 MB  (+1.18 MB, +56.13%)
  cut     1.14 MB ->    1.21 MB  (+72 KB, +6.19%)

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 4.38%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 355 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 50 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation du_summarize_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)] 17 ms 16.3 ms +4.79%
Simulation cksum_crc32b 41.9 ms 40.3 ms +3.98%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing xtqqczze:hashes-default-features (f33a4c5) with main (4b79fb9)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 50 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on main (60f7c42) during the generation of this report, so 4b79fb9 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/pid-pipe (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/symlink (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/cat/splice is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/cut/cut is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/cut/mb-non-utf8 is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/dd/partial-write is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/expand/mb is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/ls/stat-free-symlinks is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/mktemp/write-error is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/dir2dir is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/mv/mv-exchange is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/nl/multibyte is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/od/od-float is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/od/od-j is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/sort/sort-merge-fdlimit is no longer failing!
Congrats! The gnu test tests/unexpand/mb is no longer failing!
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.

@cakebaker
cakebaker merged commit 22ca93c into uutils:main Aug 20, 2026
170 of 171 checks passed
@cakebaker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks!

@xtqqczze
xtqqczze deleted the hashes-default-features branch August 20, 2026 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants