chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.14.2

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
coverage	7.14.1 → 7.14.2

---

Release Notes

coveragepy/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.14.2

Compare Source

• Fix: some messages were being written to stdout, making coverage json -o - useless for capturing JSON output. Now messages are written to stderr,
  fixing issue 2197_.

• Fix: CoverageData kept one SQLite connection per thread that recorded
  coverage, but never closed them when those threads terminated. On long runs
  with many short-lived threads this leaked one file descriptor per dead
  thread, eventually failing with OSError: [Errno 24] Too many open files.
  Connections belonging to terminated threads are now closed and dropped.
  Fixes issue 2192_.

• Fix: when using sys.monitoring, we were assuming we could use the
  COVERAGE_ID tool id. But other tools might also assume they could use
  that id. Pre-allocated ids don't really make sense, so now we search for a
  usable one instead. Fixes issue 2187. Thanks, Matthew Lloyd <pull 2198_>.

• Following the advice of cibuildwheel <no-13t_>_, we no longer distribute
  wheels for Python 3.13 free-threaded.

.. _issue 2187: #​2187
.. _issue 2192: #​2192
.. _issue 2197: #​2197
.. _pull 2198: #​2198
.. _no-13t: https://py-free-threading.github.io/ci/#building-free-threaded-wheels-with-cibuildwheel

.. _changes_7-14-1:

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • At any time (no schedule defined)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (9c5f83b)	581	581	100.00%
Head commit (bd9266e)	581 (+0)	581 (+0)	100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#752)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (9c5f83b) to head (bd9266e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #752   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          581       581           
  Branches        41        41           
=========================================
  Hits           581       581           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.