Skip to content

chore(license): standardize on Apache-2.0 per org policy - #12

Open
yakimoto wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/license-policy-2026-06
Open

chore(license): standardize on Apache-2.0 per org policy#12
yakimoto wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/license-policy-2026-06

Conversation

@yakimoto

@yakimoto yakimoto commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Per wave-foundation/LICENSE-POLICY.md: public OSS standardizes on Apache-2.0 (explicit patent grant). Replaces MIT.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Note

Low Risk
Legal/documentation-only change to LICENSE; no runtime or application code is affected.

Overview
Replaces the project’s MIT license with the full Apache License 2.0 text, aligning public OSS with org policy and adding Apache’s explicit patent grant (and related termination-on-patent-litigation terms) that MIT does not include.

The appendix copyright line now reads Copyright 2026 WAVE, Inc. instead of the prior MIT notice for WAVE Online, LLC.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6dcbc10. Configure here.


Summary by cubic

Switch license to Apache-2.0 to align with org policy. Replaces MIT with the full Apache 2.0 text (adds explicit patent grant) and updates the appendix to "Copyright 2026 WAVE, Inc."; documentation-only, no code changes.

Written for commit 6dcbc10. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6dcbc10

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@yakimoto, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 6 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 561f5863-6c78-4623-b154-a16e12c933c1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 963b7ff and 6dcbc10.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • LICENSE
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/license-policy-2026-06
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch chore/license-policy-2026-06

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@wave-bugbot

wave-bugbot Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🟢 WAVE BugBot — clear

No confident findings on the changed lines.

Local review · $0 inference · wave-dispatch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant