Fix PHPCS errors in Behat test files

[swissspidy]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Standardized spacing and formatting in maintenance-mode test scenarios.
  • No functional or behavioral changes.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: a7b98ddd-2c6d-4fcc-98d9-7bd7e935cb65

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5f0484 and f30ab59.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• features/maintenance-mode.feature

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The maintenance-mode feature scenarios now use consistent whitespace in four file_put_contents calls. Test behavior remains unchanged.

Changes

Maintenance mode formatting

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Normalize setup command formatting features/maintenance-mode.feature	Four file_put_contents calls now use consistent spacing around arguments, concatenation, and semicolons.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to f30ab

This change only normalizes formatting in Behat test setup code and introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk beyond normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: brianhenryie

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the changes. The pull request fixes PHPCS formatting errors in a Behat test file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/tests-lint

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!