Skip to content

docs(gaps): add exact-head readiness baseline - #130

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 212 commits into
mainfrom
codex/main-gap-followup
Draft

docs(gaps): add exact-head readiness baseline#130
seonghobae wants to merge 212 commits into
mainfrom
codex/main-gap-followup

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md is Wardnet's sole commercial/product-technical current-state ledger. This branch alone updates that path so protected-main security, DDD ownership, central control-plane evidence, foreign-owner boundaries, standards traceability, release readiness and buyer-visible gaps remain code-current without competing writers.

Current ledger refresh — 2026-09-13 KST

Protected/default Wardnet truth remains main@f8260f1e03836039ff9463dd99fa982e4e270c4b, merged through #155. The sole changed path remains docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.

Current ledger exact 655d5941ae87cec89515305ab61916f235c700ad adopts the live Agent Artifact Admission root #129@fff3c349891a7a3fb12b1eee507595eba7588576 after ordinary serialized integration of #398 and #400. It records #398's exact --no-python-downloads RED→GREEN, #400's unsafe uv index-strategy/parser-phase RED→GREEN, and current #129 evidence: CI 34744861636, Fuzz 34744861673, Security Scan 34744861639, SAST Semgrep 34744861657, Devin Review and CodeRabbit are SUCCESS; there are no valid unresolved inline threads and no independent approving review; required CodeQL PR 34744861693 fails only at the delegated central terminal-settlement lane after exact-head detect/read succeeded and a later same-head dispatch completed. Central owner remains .github#1929 / its verified successor stack; Wardnet does not copy that workflow, source-churn to redispatch, synthesize status or use routine bypass.

Runtime Configuration remains #140@e05df185c50a3792cf487c404c4dac68bc2daf36, still pre-#155/non-mergeable, with #310 as protected-base synthesis. PostgreSQL dependents remain parked until the foundation stabilizes. Draft #361 exact c6d3fd45eba1aceef074cc8b9934937f67b1d41a is the canonical PRD/TRD/UML lane. #111 remains the ADR consolidation lane; #333 remains the sole CodeGraph guidance repair.

Fresh read-only owner inventory remains CGC protected/default develop@99cb5468ba3c15c5e79688f53dee74724fae2d13 and EA protected/default develop@dd71e40a86385fb7861b0f1be19891a3f3e29ece; both release inventories remain empty. Wardnet writes neither repository while the Context Fabric writer owns them and consumes only released compatible contracts/provenance. Wardnet's GitHub Release inventory remains empty.

The live default-branch ruleset remains 18156473; generic solo-maintainer approval remains central .github#772, runner/materialization/OpenCode remains .github#712 / .github#1234 or verified successors, and delegated CodeQL settlement remains .github#1929 or verified successor.

Exact-current ledger evidence

Current #130 exact head is 655d5941ae87cec89515305ab61916f235c700ad. All predecessor #130 workflow/review conclusions are historical and do not transfer.

Fresh exact-head runs have materialized and are currently queued:

  • CI 34747556632QUEUED;
  • Security Scan 34747556638QUEUED;
  • SAST Semgrep 34747556633QUEUED;
  • CodeQL PR 34747556623QUEUED.

Keep #130 Draft. Do not promote predecessor GREEN, self/model approve, add no-op churn, or use routine administrator bypass. Reacquire exact-current review/thread and all then-live terminal gate evidence on unchanged 655d5941... before any integration decision.

Merge / release boundary

Do not merge #130 until its unchanged current head is terminal-valid under the live ruleset and governance. Do not release Wardnet until one protected exact head binds version/CHANGELOG/tag/package or image identity, SBOM/provenance/signature, reproducibility, deployment promotion, rollback/roll-forward and recovery evidence. Wardnet's current GitHub Release inventory is empty.

No self/model approval, force update, destructive rebase, mutable foreign dependency, source copy, cross-service SQL, gate weakening, predecessor-evidence transfer, synthetic status or routine administrator bypass.

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note

This report is out of date. Scroll down for Devin Review's latest report on this PR.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Devin Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cda0e1ae-06a5-409e-b2b7-732e4c3dad88

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee6e643 and 8da77f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

제품·기술 격차 기준선 문서를 갱신했습니다. 스냅샷 시간과 열린 PR 수를 변경했습니다. PR별 현재 헤드, 필수 검사, 미해결 리뷰 스레드 상태를 반영했습니다.

Changes

제품·기술 격차 기준선

Layer / File(s) Summary
스냅샷과 열린 작업 인벤토리
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
스냅샷 시간을 2026-08-30T18:57:50+09:00으로 갱신했습니다. 열린 PR 수를 15개로 변경했습니다. #131의 현재 헤드 검사 상태를 추가했습니다. #112의 필수 Strix Security Scan 결과 부재와 #95의 새 헤드, 실패한 필수 검사, 7개 미해결 리뷰 스레드를 반영했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 8da77

This PR refreshes a tracked readiness document and does not change product behavior or runtime configuration; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 제목은 exact-head readiness baseline 문서를 추가하는 주요 변경을 정확하고 간결하게 설명합니다.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/main-gap-followup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

cwl-noema-review[bot]
cwl-noema-review Bot previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2026

@cwl-noema-review cwl-noema-review Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noema LLM review

The PR adds a documentation baseline that accurately reflects the live exact-head GitHub inventory. Prior review feedback (PR count exclusion, #129 RED state, #112 missing Strix, #95 gate mislabeling, broken links) has been incorporated. The document is internally consistent, clearly dated, and does not introduce code or behavioral changes. No blocking issues remain.

Reviewed changed lines

  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:3 (RIGHT): Snapshot date and scope note correctly identify the inventory as a dated snapshot, not a perpetual live claim. This addresses the mixed-time concern from prior threads.
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT): The open PR count explicitly excludes #130 and matches the 17 rows in the table. The #129 row now records the historical RED state and points to section 1.1 for newer evidence, resolving the prior thread.
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:36 (RIGHT): The #112 row now identifies the absent required Strix Security Scan, correcting the earlier claim that all hosted checks were green. This aligns with the prior bug report.
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:39 (RIGHT): The #95 row now correctly states Strix failed and opencode-review lacks a passing verdict, reversing the earlier mislabeling. Unresolved threads and missing approval are also noted.

Adversarial validation

  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT) falsified: The open PR count and table rows are consistent and exclude #130. — Counted 17 rows in the table (PRs #135, #134, #131, #129, #127, #126, #115, #114, #112, #111, #95, #94, #93, #90, #88, #77, #72) and the text states '17 other open PRs, intentionally excluding this baseline PR (#130)'. The count matches exactly.
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:33 (RIGHT) falsified: The #129 row accurately reflects the historical RED state and does not claim current readiness. — The row states 'Draft, intentionally blocked' and 'Historical 2026-08-31 snapshot: the then-current head was intentionally RED and lacked independent review.' It also directs to section 1.1 for newer evidence, which is dated 2026-09-01 and explicitly notes the head is not protected-main truth.
  • Residual risk: The document is a point-in-time snapshot; external PR states may have changed since the snapshot date. However, the document explicitly disclaims perpetual live status and provides a refresh mechanism in section 1.1.

Findings

  • No blocking findings.

  • Result: APPROVE

  • Head SHA: 8472b54e3dc83a690ef9302ee883f0bf5ffd2990

  • Reviewer credential: noema-review-github-app

  • Actor: cwl-noema-review[bot]

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@devin Refresh the canonical baseline on this existing branch from live protected main@cc15cc2c34daf8c104eeb83d52a6a66f3cd6e128; do not open a duplicate baseline PR. The current body/file still anchors the older protected main b2bcee3..., so the baseline is stale after protected merge #137.

Re-read the full live Wardnet PR/issue inventory and update only docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md plus this PR body as needed. At minimum record #137 as protected-main external-secret truth; current exact heads/status for #138, #136, #129, #140, #93, #141, #142; #75 as newly executable now that #137 landed; the queue-starvation owner path .github#712; solo-maintainer governance owner .github#772; and that Context Graph/EA still have no immutable releases and remain read-only candidate dependencies. Do not turn queued workflows into passing evidence or treat PR-base snapshot SHA as the live base tip. Run the document validation/diff checks used by this branch and commit the smallest refresh to the existing branch.

@devin-ai-integration

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Failed to start a Devin session. Please try again.

@seonghobae
seonghobae dismissed stale reviews from opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], opencode-agent[bot], and opencode-agent[bot] September 11, 2026 22:16

Dismissed as stale predecessor-head OpenCode review. Current #130 head is b59a7c0; predecessor failed-check rollups are historical, not current findings. This is not approval.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sole-ledger handoff from the Agent Artifact Admission lane; do not copy source logic.

Fresh evidence now supersedes the #130 body’s latest #129 narrative:

  • parent feat(security): gate AI-agent artifact installation #129 remains exact e9ac86240a26cb6ccf5a406e05c636c766cee63a;
  • issue security(agent-admission): reject clustered pip mutation short options #343 / Draft child fix(security): reject clustered pip mutation options #344 is current exact a7900715b6fa9f7f6563655971964a4bbf60b170;
  • first semantic RED: test-only 12b5f1f45a773c080d60910f84480160745a2d46, CI 34657138688 / rust 103451886561, pip -Ivv admitted instead of blocked after checkout/toolchain/fmt passed;
  • second semantic RED: production-unchanged c59272398d2cdcfe0f16d35ae4efe674a6e3d1d2, CI 34658434263 / rust 103455722023, exact unit boundary failed on -Uv after checkout/toolchain/fmt and root/runtime suites passed;
  • minimum Wardnet-local repair 56f0c7791d159b1bca3752fa836a5aa5ddf3a8c9 introduces one bounded direct-pip no-value short-cluster grammar over {v,q,I,U}, preserving value-taking short-option semantics and canonical owner boundaries;
  • current docs/evidence head a7900715... is reacquiring exact CI 34659018803 and Fuzz 34659018782; both are non-passing until terminal, so do not promote predecessor GREEN.

Ledger acceptance: record #343/#344 as active security-gap repair without claiming protected/main resolution; preserve #130 as the sole docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md writer; after ordinary #344#129 integration, refresh to the new exact #129 root and its own exact-head evidence. Keep issue #343 open until the effective delta reaches protected main or a verified complete successor.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Owner handoff from canonical Agent Artifact Admission lane; do not create a second ledger writer.

Fresh #129 exact state has moved after ordinary expected-head integration of verified child #344:

Please refresh only docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md on the existing #130 lane from this exact evidence after re-reading live refs/checks. Preserve the existing Wardnet/quarantine/EgressWeave/contextual-orchestrator/AppGuardrail ownership split and do not promote mutable foreign-owner heads to release authority.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2026 10:18
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2026 14:07

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fresh single-writer ledger handoff: docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md on current #130 exact 90f6326a82c504725d9556233f3b49210bcbe27b is stale in its Agent Artifact Admission current-state evidence. I am not editing that path from another lane because #130 is the sole writer.

The ledger still anchors #129 at e618f37dcff24b8dae4416eacac9a2456a8f8a93, latest child #360, root checks 346805..., and central CodeQL handoff .github#1929 comment 5644494204.

Current canonical admission truth is:

  • protected base remains main@f8260f1e03836039ff9463dd99fa982e4e270c4b;
  • canonical Draft feat(security): gate AI-agent artifact installation #129 exact head is 81c35ec36d1289446b54d2b937e42f8fc9df2751 after ordinary/non-force integration of latest child security(admission): retain global uv torch-backend evidence #390;
  • security(admission): retain global uv torch-backend evidence #390 final child exact 0c188b5ada37e2b2faed128c8be9def3370ac674 retained the hostile uv global-option --torch-backend evidence RED→GREEN repair, with exact-head CI 34730449838 and Fuzz 34730449856 terminal SUCCESS before integration;
  • current feat(security): gate AI-agent artifact installation #129 CI 34730739634, Fuzz 34730739592, Security Scan 34730739623, and SAST Semgrep 34730739603 are terminal SUCCESS; Devin Review and CodeRabbit statuses are SUCCESS; current valid unresolved inline threads are zero; no independent approving review is present;
  • required CodeQL PR 34730739681 fails only at the delegated central settlement boundary: detect job 103652933210 succeeded, compatibility job 103652954310 read current-head state then failed Release runner or enforce current-head CodeQL verdict, and downstream dispatch job 103653306996 subsequently succeeded on the same unchanged head;
  • fresh exact consumer RCA/RED→GREEN acceptance is handed to canonical .github#1929 in comment 5649985809; active central repair is the #2106 → #2040 owner chain. No Wardnet workflow copy, source-neutral retrigger, synthetic status, or bypass is appropriate;
  • issue security(agent-admission): preserve uv global torch-backend source evidence #389 remains open until the effective repair reaches protected main or a verified complete successor.

Read-only owner inventory is unchanged: CGC develop@99cb5468ba3c15c5e79688f53dee74724fae2d13, EA develop@dd71e40a86385fb7861b0f1be19891a3f3e29ece, with empty release inventories; Wardnet's GitHub Release inventory is also empty.

Acceptance for the sole ledger writer: refresh the snapshot/current #129 lineage, latest causal slice/check IDs and central handoff while preserving all unrelated ledger sections and owner boundaries. Because that advances #130's exact head, reacquire its own exact-head repository/security/review evidence afterward. No predecessor evidence transfer, self/model approval, bypass, or source-neutral freshness commit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: blocked Blocked by conflict, dependency, or required prerequisite type: docs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants