docs(gaps): add exact-head readiness baseline - #130
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough제품·기술 격차 기준선 문서를 갱신했습니다. 스냅샷 시간과 열린 PR 수를 변경했습니다. PR별 현재 헤드, 필수 검사, 미해결 리뷰 스레드 상태를 반영했습니다. Changes제품·기술 격차 기준선
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR refreshes a tracked readiness document and does not change product behavior or runtime configuration; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Noema LLM review
The PR adds a documentation baseline that accurately reflects the live exact-head GitHub inventory. Prior review feedback (PR count exclusion, #129 RED state, #112 missing Strix, #95 gate mislabeling, broken links) has been incorporated. The document is internally consistent, clearly dated, and does not introduce code or behavioral changes. No blocking issues remain.
Reviewed changed lines
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:3 (RIGHT): Snapshot date and scope note correctly identify the inventory as a dated snapshot, not a perpetual live claim. This addresses the mixed-time concern from prior threads.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT): The open PR count explicitly excludes #130 and matches the 17 rows in the table. The #129 row now records the historical RED state and points to section 1.1 for newer evidence, resolving the prior thread.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:36 (RIGHT): The #112 row now identifies the absent required Strix Security Scan, correcting the earlier claim that all hosted checks were green. This aligns with the prior bug report.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:39 (RIGHT): The #95 row now correctly states Strix failed and opencode-review lacks a passing verdict, reversing the earlier mislabeling. Unresolved threads and missing approval are also noted.
Adversarial validation
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:31 (RIGHT)falsified: The open PR count and table rows are consistent and exclude #130. — Counted 17 rows in the table (PRs #135, #134, #131, #129, #127, #126, #115, #114, #112, #111, #95, #94, #93, #90, #88, #77, #72) and the text states '17 other open PRs, intentionally excluding this baseline PR (#130)'. The count matches exactly.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md:33 (RIGHT)falsified: The #129 row accurately reflects the historical RED state and does not claim current readiness. — The row states 'Draft, intentionally blocked' and 'Historical 2026-08-31 snapshot: the then-current head was intentionally RED and lacked independent review.' It also directs to section 1.1 for newer evidence, which is dated 2026-09-01 and explicitly notes the head is not protected-main truth.- Residual risk: The document is a point-in-time snapshot; external PR states may have changed since the snapshot date. However, the document explicitly disclaims perpetual live status and provides a refresh mechanism in section 1.1.
Findings
-
No blocking findings.
-
Result: APPROVE
-
Head SHA:
8472b54e3dc83a690ef9302ee883f0bf5ffd2990 -
Reviewer credential:
noema-review-github-app -
Actor:
cwl-noema-review[bot]
|
@devin Refresh the canonical baseline on this existing branch from live protected Re-read the full live Wardnet PR/issue inventory and update only |
|
Failed to start a Devin session. Please try again. |
|
Sole-ledger handoff from the Agent Artifact Admission lane; do not copy source logic. Fresh evidence now supersedes the #130 body’s latest #129 narrative:
Ledger acceptance: record #343/#344 as active security-gap repair without claiming protected/main resolution; preserve #130 as the sole |
|
Owner handoff from canonical Agent Artifact Admission lane; do not create a second ledger writer. Fresh #129 exact state has moved after ordinary expected-head integration of verified child #344:
Please refresh only |
|
Fresh single-writer ledger handoff: The ledger still anchors #129 at Current canonical admission truth is:
Read-only owner inventory is unchanged: CGC Acceptance for the sole ledger writer: refresh the snapshot/current #129 lineage, latest causal slice/check IDs and central handoff while preserving all unrelated ledger sections and owner boundaries. Because that advances #130's exact head, reacquire its own exact-head repository/security/review evidence afterward. No predecessor evidence transfer, self/model approval, bypass, or source-neutral freshness commit. |
Purpose
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdis Wardnet's sole commercial/product-technical current-state ledger. This branch alone updates that path so protected-main security, DDD ownership, central control-plane evidence, foreign-owner boundaries, standards traceability, release readiness and buyer-visible gaps remain code-current without competing writers.Current ledger refresh — 2026-09-13 KST
Protected/default Wardnet truth remains
main@f8260f1e03836039ff9463dd99fa982e4e270c4b, merged through #155. The sole changed path remainsdocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.Current ledger exact
655d5941ae87cec89515305ab61916f235c700adadopts the live Agent Artifact Admission root#129@fff3c349891a7a3fb12b1eee507595eba7588576after ordinary serialized integration of #398 and #400. It records #398's exact--no-python-downloadsRED→GREEN, #400's unsafe uv index-strategy/parser-phase RED→GREEN, and current #129 evidence: CI34744861636, Fuzz34744861673, Security Scan34744861639, SAST Semgrep34744861657, Devin Review and CodeRabbit are SUCCESS; there are no valid unresolved inline threads and no independent approving review; required CodeQL PR34744861693fails only at the delegated central terminal-settlement lane after exact-head detect/read succeeded and a later same-head dispatch completed. Central owner remains.github#1929/ its verified successor stack; Wardnet does not copy that workflow, source-churn to redispatch, synthesize status or use routine bypass.Runtime Configuration remains
#140@e05df185c50a3792cf487c404c4dac68bc2daf36, still pre-#155/non-mergeable, with #310 as protected-base synthesis. PostgreSQL dependents remain parked until the foundation stabilizes. Draft #361 exactc6d3fd45eba1aceef074cc8b9934937f67b1d41ais the canonical PRD/TRD/UML lane. #111 remains the ADR consolidation lane; #333 remains the sole CodeGraph guidance repair.Fresh read-only owner inventory remains CGC protected/default
develop@99cb5468ba3c15c5e79688f53dee74724fae2d13and EA protected/defaultdevelop@dd71e40a86385fb7861b0f1be19891a3f3e29ece; both release inventories remain empty. Wardnet writes neither repository while the Context Fabric writer owns them and consumes only released compatible contracts/provenance. Wardnet's GitHub Release inventory remains empty.The live default-branch ruleset remains
18156473; generic solo-maintainer approval remains central.github#772, runner/materialization/OpenCode remains.github#712/.github#1234or verified successors, and delegated CodeQL settlement remains.github#1929or verified successor.Exact-current ledger evidence
Current #130 exact head is
655d5941ae87cec89515305ab61916f235c700ad. All predecessor #130 workflow/review conclusions are historical and do not transfer.Fresh exact-head runs have materialized and are currently queued:
34747556632— QUEUED;34747556638— QUEUED;34747556633— QUEUED;34747556623— QUEUED.Keep #130 Draft. Do not promote predecessor GREEN, self/model approve, add no-op churn, or use routine administrator bypass. Reacquire exact-current review/thread and all then-live terminal gate evidence on unchanged
655d5941...before any integration decision.Merge / release boundary
Do not merge #130 until its unchanged current head is terminal-valid under the live ruleset and governance. Do not release Wardnet until one protected exact head binds version/CHANGELOG/tag/package or image identity, SBOM/provenance/signature, reproducibility, deployment promotion, rollback/roll-forward and recovery evidence. Wardnet's current GitHub Release inventory is empty.
No self/model approval, force update, destructive rebase, mutable foreign dependency, source copy, cross-service SQL, gate weakening, predecessor-evidence transfer, synthetic status or routine administrator bypass.