Skip to content

research(h25): expose reviewed primary baseline and runner ancestry - #6837

Open
Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Clear1nsight:research/h25-primary-baseline-readable-20261107
Open

Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Clear1nsight:research/h25-primary-baseline-readable-20261107

Conversation

@Clear1nsight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The primary H25 comparison needs the original PR6029 baseline owner and the exact common-runner ancestry. The later candidate archive does not supply those readable inputs, and the retained instrumented full:baseline diagnostic cannot substitute for the original primary sample.

This contribution exports 25 inert, readable files under research/h25-primary-baseline-readable-inputs/: the already source-reviewed primary owner/receiver and control source, its shared dependencies and open-gate/cost contracts, the original runner and reviewed compatibility successor, and the retained source reviews and inverse data. It supplies review inputs rather than a new baseline producer or executable comparison.

Validation performed for this export:

  • Complete-byte and SHA256 equality against all 21 retained original source/review inputs.
  • All nine module pins in the configured DAG match the retained sources.
  • Reversing the two declared substitutions recovers the full original runner bytes exactly.

No archived module was imported, no controls or scientific workload were rerun, and no native code was compiled. No scientific replay hook is registered. Current environment, caller/settlement integration, common-runner compatibility for the different candidate runner, complete resource funding and actual execution admission remain open. This archive establishes no timing, equality or performance result.

Original investigation: #6321. Scientific predecessor: #6029. Related candidate source: #6830 at 39fcd67c991bd72918080b1d2c02feb3d679206d; readable original scientific inputs: #6744. See the README for exact hashes, provenance, credit and the next concrete compatibility question.

Prepared with substantial OpenAI Codex and ChatGPT Pro assistance. Retained source reviews are independent AI source reviews within their stated limits, not independent human review or proof-kernel acceptance. New export prose/metadata are Apache-2.0; original notices and source-specific licences are retained.

@Clear1nsight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Delivery verified at exact head 92bd2213be787cc4451a3b61b00793dad26bebdd, base 7c49fe32c55de02c2c873655c804b16e4c3fef0a: one commit, exactly 25 added files, all full remote file bodies and Git blob identities matching the approved frozen source export. This PR is Ready for review; maintainer modification remains disabled.

Hosted workflow attempt 1 completed successfully at this head: plan succeeded, including onboarding helper tests and changed-package selection; replay was skipped. These are repository planning checks, not candidate/scientific execution or runtime qualification.

Original-PR handoff with established result, predecessor credit and smallest next task. Scope is unchanged: readable accepted-source/provenance and exact runner ancestry. The primary comparison, common-runner compatibility of the current different candidate runner, actual source-associated environment, complete resource/current funding bill and execution admission remain open. No archived code or unchanged controls were rerun for this export.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant