Skip to content

Bind full verification callers and retention to genuine source owners - #6871

Open
Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Clear1nsight:h25-s0703-genuine-consumers-20261108
Open

Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
Clear1nsight:h25-s0703-genuine-consumers-20261108

Conversation

@Clear1nsight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Change and mathematical scope

Supplies the complete source argument connecting genuine cache/full-caller context and automatic retention to their actual consumers at PR #6867. The proof traces real private modules, cold authority, epoch/caller objects, full CLI and retirement, then actual registry seal, issuer, fork borrower and independent parent full readback before successful release.

This source theorem retains the original genuine-entry premise. It does not supply the missing external native-G entry owner, a live runtime instance, complete controls, original-primary comparison or successful CLOSE. Complete installation still needs the authenticated late-pin transport and its actual caller, preserving original financial/command semantics.

This is an inert source-audit archive, complete within the scope stated here and prepared Ready for review. Independent AI source analysis and a contribution-author source/criterion audit do not constitute human review, proof-kernel acceptance, runtime admission or a speedup claim. The original predicates, independent oracles, modes, reservations and error/cleanup semantics remain unchanged.

Task and overlap

Explicit follow-up to the original investigation and maintained specification/PR map. Scope is unchanged. Extends #6869 with constructor-to-consumer and lifecycle proofs. The apparent retention-cache loader concern is resolved by reached-call analysis, not by permitting arbitrary module mutation. Pending child success cannot supply the parent acceptance gate. Earlier accepted scientific internals are reused within their original source contracts; omitted bodies are not described as newly reread.

Base 7c49fe32c55de02c2c873655c804b16e4c3fef0a; owning implementation head 319ea1c5f4097ef87cc0b037327f26374e93e54d; exact internal reconciliation head 1144f0a715e84b3f08ebe7d0e8ed8a06543f2fad. The source decision, certificate and scope records retain exact predecessor pins and credit, including #6715/#6736/#6752/#6756, #6830 and #6863/#6864/#6866/#6867. External immutable source dependencies are explicit; they are not assumed to be ancestors of this audit commit.

Validation

  • Completed independent Pro source argument and challenging review, followed by the contribution-author assessment against the unchanged original criterion.
  • All 6 committed UTF-8 file bodies were fetched independently and matched their exact Git blob identities. Every non-self entry in INTEGRITY.json matched its declared byte count and SHA256.
  • JSON certificates and scope records parse successfully. Existing complete 66-leaf source subject and accepted scientific 52-helper/65-context selection are retained at the unchanged implementation head.
  • No selected implementation changed. No target import, archive decompression, native/compiler/scientific work, unchanged control rerun, new financial/runtime operation or guarded policy debit. Physical preparation/review/publication and historical gaps remain OPEN_NOT_ZERO.

There is no registered replay hook for this inert source archive. The README and certificate give immutable source acquisition, byte identity and review boundaries. Hosted planning/onboarding and skipped replay are separate from scientific qualification; exact-head results will be recorded after submission. Actual runtime/currentness/native/resource qualification, full control union, original-primary comparison and successful CLOSE remain separate obligations.

Credit

Preserves the original Clear1nsight investigation and linked predecessor source/proof contributions and notices. Prepared with substantial ChatGPT Pro and OpenAI Codex assistance. New material is Apache-2.0. AI review supplies no maintainer endorsement.

Open next questions

This source theorem retains the original genuine-entry premise. It does not supply the missing external native-G entry owner, a live runtime instance, complete controls, original-primary comparison or successful CLOSE. Complete installation still needs the authenticated late-pin transport and its actual caller, preserving original financial/command semantics. Start with the exact current entry-owner interfaces in private_loader, role_contracts, original A/F and the native guardian. Preserve candidate/shell identities and all original ownership, grant, resource, pending-birth, error and terminal conditions. The maintained specification records the complete related PRs and concrete contributor tasks.

@Clear1nsight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Publication verification and handoff

Exact submitted head: 167b4f7babb00fff832114bc7cec25d3060b6b73, one commit and 6 added files. The PR is Ready for review, unmerged, with maintainer edits disabled. All intended remote file bodies and Git blob identities were read back; the package's non-self integrity entries match.

Hosted run 42456887998, attempt 1, completed successfully at this exact head: planning and onboarding passed; replay was skipped. No scientific replay or unchanged controls were run for this audit.

The genuine cache/full-caller and automatic-retention consumer binding is accepted for its original source-only scope on the unchanged implementation in #6867. This does not establish actual full-input execution or successful complete-outcome closing.

Maintained original-investigation overview and complete PR map. The related results are #6870, #6871 and #6872, following #6869 and #6867. The next decisive construction must preserve the original authority, command, ownership, error and terminal contracts. Existing failed evidence and independent oracles remain preserved.

No guarded budget was added or spent. Complete physical preparation, review, publication and historical cost gaps remain OPEN_NOT_ZERO. Source review is AI-assisted, not independent human or proof-kernel acceptance. Predecessor and contributor credit remains in the package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant