Repository navigation
Archive native acquisition templates and family completion corrections - #6882
Clear1nsight wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Delivery verified at commit Hosted run 42516468760, attempt 1: planning passed, including the onboarding helper checks; replay was skipped. This is an archive/planning result, not candidate execution, native qualification, a complete control-union result or a measured performance gain. The maintained goal, PR map and contributor tasks now include this contribution, and the research-hub pointer has been updated. Earlier PRs, frozen drafts and original acceptance criteria are retained. The next source dependency is the exact selected child constructor and production-copy/profile compatibility, followed by complete terminal custody and the remaining authentic fault bodies and execution map. Both previously omitted child bodies are supplied as unreviewed references. Complete runtime/resource/funding admission, full outcomes and the genuine primary comparison remain open. Source and substantive review are closed; this publication adds no execution, budget or merge authority. |
Change and mathematical scope
Preserve proposed native acquisition controls and the concrete family completion correction as an independently reviewable source archive. Fourteen complete owning files add three ordinary filesystem acquisition subcases, an observer over the genuine retained error owner, a fixed parent judge, and actual calls through
seal_family,finish_modeandconsume_component_union. Individual unit and envelope receipts remain partial.The same source correction initializes the fresh child's publication binding, adds the Root-reached entry call, avoids a duplicate replay debit, retains first delivered errors before changed helper calls, prevents timer errors from bypassing one cleanup attempt, and corrects the dotted-import/source-verifier mismatch. The proposed control module census changes explicitly from 57 to 63; no physical or financial cap is increased.
This is a completed source archive with scoped independent AI review, supplied for upstream assessment. It is not an installed or runtime-qualified control suite. The three cases do not complete a whole original family. The complete original control implementation, identity/execution mapping and independent whole-union acceptance remain open. No new original activity, measured performance result, mathematical bound or κ is claimed.
Package:
research/h25-native-acquisition-family-source/. It contains the unchanged final sources, review and freeze records, ten prior-draft records, exact source references and licenses. Two previously omitted selected-child bodies are now included as explicitly unreviewed references so that the constructor gap can be examined directly.Task and overlap
This is the user's explicit continuation of the original investigation #6321; the maintained goal and contributor overview gives the wider objective. The original objective is unchanged. This PR contributes completed, bounded source work toward it and preserves every remaining full-activity obligation.
Base:
7c49fe32c55de02c2c873655c804b16e4c3fef0a. The current main and implicated heads were refreshed before publication. The earlier control owner in #6588,ff7df8391c3bb3f5518ce43682ba4c1e41380e3e, remains separate. The accepted scientific/external-entry subject in #6873,ae7add49484492b49b0141445fbfd6002858da54, is unchanged.The archive records compatible reuse and limitations from #6339, #6346, #6347 and #6351. It does not copy the older ambient-exception decision as a complete local-primary primitive. The bounded all-state search and exact inspected heads are retained; no global novelty or code-absence claim is made.
Validation
All 48 frozen returned records, including fourteen owning sources and ten prior-draft records, match their byte counts and SHA256 values. All fourteen owning Python files pass passive AST parsing without imports. The independent AI review and its detached freeze match the actual final owning bytes.
Implementation froze at
2026-11-08T12:53:52.646998Z; independent review froze at12:55:00.218868Z, before the fixed13:01:01Zstop. Export, readback and publication occurred later as metadata/delivery work and do not extend the source/review window.For archive integrity only, run from the package directory:
The archive intentionally has no candidate replay hook. No target imports, finite controls, native operations, compiler builds, scientific runs, financial operations or benchmark replays were performed. Planning and skipped replay results cannot establish candidate execution. Complete runtime/profile eligibility, full resource fit, funding and terminal retirement remain unproved; outside and historical costs remain
OPEN_NOT_ZERO.Credit
Preserve the predecessor work linked above and the source notices/licenses in the reference files. Substantial source construction and independent challenge used ChatGPT Pro and AI source-review agents. The recorded review is AI review, not human, maintainer, proof-kernel, runtime or financial approval. Frozen failed drafts and surviving counterexamples remain available.
Open next questions