Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration: the sharp relaxed error for replacing two independent rank-one Gaussian tensor targets through one rank-r child, norm-bounded rectangular adapters and a column-sparse bypass is
Here r>=2, the adapter maximum-column-sum/maximum-row-sum norm product is at most M, and the bypass has at most h nonzeros per column. Every column obeys the lower bound. A two-spectator projected construction attains both minima simultaneously in the relaxation.
For fixed M and sublinear bypass support, the error tends to one. At f=8, r=2 and M=1, error at most 1/2 requires at least 184 bypass entries per 256-entry target column. The attainer expands banks by 2^((r-1)f), so this is an obstruction and exact relaxed optimum, not an affordable physical fusion or new kappa.
Evidence
From the repository root, the exact local reproduction commands are:
Any CPython 3.12 interpreter may replace the local path. The direct marker is
PASS_SHARP_APPROXIMATE_NATIVE_FUSION; the runner reportsPASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE.Limitations and credit
The universal quantifiers rest on PROOF.md. The error metrics are the induced l1-to-l2 norm and normalized Frobenius norm; spectral-norm optimality is unclaimed. The model permits complex width-dependent singular rectangular adapters, arbitrary finite spectator multiplicity, zero preparation, output projection and an otherwise unpriced sparse bypass. Physical bank stock, source delivery, routing, precision, ownership return, dirty restoration, tape costs and a favorable complete recursive invoice remain separate obligations. The equality construction uses exponentially expanded banks. No selected cold replay, physical caller, Lean or Docker replay, supplier admission or complete multiplication theorem is supplied. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
The proof and checker were produced by Nick Petalas. Credit ToikY #7166 for the rectangular norm model and projection, Clear1nsight #4932/#4045/#3989 for related scoped fusion boundaries, and zxv, Clear1nsight #7161, Rohan Arun #7113 and the retained Gaussian native lineage. The source proof is cited at exact head
6efb5d028b3212fba68edfb725608413622d6ab6; no predecessor code or external runtime input is used.Canonical base
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57, priority revision 8, selected #7000. The coverage-law-change card changes to a local approximate-interface obstruction. Only this six-file package is added. Advance CLAIM.Open next questions
Related open work
The completion refresh checked this account's open PRs created since the CLAIM. #7256 is the newly related result; the other new submissions study different objects or quantities. No extra scientific computation checked their results.
These relations compare published contracts only. No additional computation checked another contribution's numbers.
CI notes
CI did not certify this package. At unchanged head
216e44a60b474ca7b09d591a7eb288282b85a734, run 43023693429, plan job 130532925619, failed inOnboarding helper tests. I read the completed checks once and inspected the job log directly. It reports exactly one failure among 760 tests, with 24 skipped:Direct inspection of canonical base
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57confirms thatcertificates/selected-result.jsonrequiresmake frontier7000-verify, whiledocs/ci-verification.mdstill describes #6030 andmake frontier6030-verify. This PR changes neither file nor the failing test. The mismatch is in the unchanged repository baseline.The dependent replay job 130535127874 was skipped. There is no hosted scientific replay evidence for this package. The local normal/optimized registered checks, exact committed-byte/mode/source-history checks and read-only Git-free exported replays above remain the execution evidence.
I directly inspected all four comparison job logs and verified the same sole failing test, missing-command assertion and 760-test/one-failure/24-skipped totals:
No fix, retrigger commit, push or workflow rerun was made. The repository-level repair remains with maintainers. Independent human and formal proof-kernel review are unclaimed.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way.
Blast Radius: isolated.
One new research package. Scientific acceptance and selected-frontier admission remain separate decisions.