Repository navigation
chore(quest): plan Ed25519 verify without ADX and a per-host bench lock - #401
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Your OpenCode Go account is out of credit. Top it up, then re-trigger Pullfrog. OpenCode Go's response
|
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 55 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
kixelated
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Automated review by review (OpenAI)
Reviewed head: 2a830d8
No actionable findings in these three planning-only files. The new quest links resolve, the Ed25519 goal follows the repository's performance/verification policy, and #397's raw VPS results support the stated 1.3× RustCrypto baseline. The lock goal addresses the existing collector's destructive copy-before-busy-check ordering.
Direction: proceed with these follow-up plans; review the eventual implementations separately, including cross-platform locking and no-ADX performance evidence. The referenced VPS support currently remains in open PR #397 rather than this branch.
Verification limits: GitHub-only static review of the complete diff, related collector code, policy, discussions, and benchmark data. I did not run quest check, tests, or remote benchmarks.

Plans the two follow-ups moq-dev/rind#397 found, as the maintainer asked:
quest/m2/speed/ed25519-no-adx.md[M]: Ed25519 verification is 1.3x RustCrypto's time on the new OVH VPS hosts, whose virtual CPUs hide ADX.quest/m2/speed/bench-host-lock.md[XS]:admin/bench-report collecttakes a per-host lock on every host, after one session's collection clobbered another's on kixtop.quest checkpasses.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)