Repository navigation
Link an affiliation's FileMaker code to the archive - #2649
Merged
Merged
Conversation
maebeale
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 12, 2026 20:04
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-data-filemaker
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 12, 2026 22:02
526132a to
16a98ab
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-links-affiliations
branch
from
October 12, 2026 22:17
282928a to
d725a87
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-data-filemaker
branch
from
October 12, 2026 22:47
d1cea11 to
af52177
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-links-affiliations
branch
from
October 12, 2026 22:51
d725a87 to
9612125
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-data-filemaker
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 12, 2026 23:26
45dd33c to
ddde227
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-links-affiliations
branch
from
October 12, 2026 23:27
9612125 to
1e2ff66
Compare
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-data-filemaker
branch
from
October 12, 2026 23:37
ddde227 to
4976121
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
🤖 From Claude: Production data says affiliation codes are project ids, not Personnel ids, so What prod affiliations hold (read-only profile, 2026-10-12)
Change before merging
Rebase notes once #2648 merges (it moved a lot)
|
The affiliation edit page took a FileMaker code but offered no way to open it. Per ADR-0005, production affiliation codes are their program's project id, with one real Personnel id, so affiliations look a code up in projects, then personnel. A project's archive page lists the affiliations carrying its code alongside its org. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
maebeale
force-pushed
the
maebeale/archive-links-affiliations
branch
from
October 13, 2026 01:28
1e2ff66 to
64e9837
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 suggested review level: 3 Read 📖 one model declaration, one form field, admin-only
Admins can open an affiliation's FileMaker record from its edit page, and the archive record links back to the affiliation.
fm_projects, thenfm_personnels, per ADR-0005. Production affiliation codes are their program's project id (1,531 of 1,535), with one realPSpersonnel id.FilemakerCodedalso applies itsnormalizesto affiliation codes: whitespace is stripped and the list is saved sorted.🤖 Generated with Claude Code