Skip to content

[ci] Read frozen CI baselines strictly - #3577

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Ghrxpfppzzenc5ecwz3u273gd42e4psk7from
Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i
Open

[ci] Read frozen CI baselines strictly#3577
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Ghrxpfppzzenc5ecwz3u273gd42e4psk7from
Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add typed, data-only readers for the eight files which record legacy CI
behavior. Require exact headers, field counts, row order, identifiers,
paths, counts, hashes, command forms, action references, and canonical
JSON. Reject invalid UTF-8, control characters, duplicate rows, and
manifest counts which disagree with the parsed data.

Keep parsed fields private and expose validated constructors so future
plans cannot bypass the same invariants when comparing exact sets.
Report missing and extra work separately and in deterministic order.

This reader deliberately does not parse workflow YAML or regenerate the
baseline. The checked-in files remain independent review evidence from
the old workflow rather than an expectation produced by the new planner.

Tests: standalone warning-free compilation; 12 baseline mutation tests.

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account


Latest Update: v9 — Compare vs v8

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i && git checkout -b pr-Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (Ghrxpfppzzenc5ecwz3u273gd42e4psk7@f277ad7). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                         Coverage Diff                          @@
##             Ghrxpfppzzenc5ecwz3u273gd42e4psk7    #3577   +/-   ##
====================================================================
  Coverage                                     ?   91.85%           
====================================================================
  Files                                        ?       20           
  Lines                                        ?     6093           
  Branches                                     ?        0           
====================================================================
  Hits                                         ?     5597           
  Misses                                       ?      496           
  Partials                                     ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: 4864e15686

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

joshlf commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: b49d72d882

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Add typed, data-only readers for the eight files which record legacy CI
behavior. Require exact headers, field counts, row order, identifiers,
paths, counts, hashes, command forms, action references, and canonical
JSON. Reject invalid UTF-8, control characters, duplicate rows, and
manifest counts which disagree with the parsed data.

Keep parsed fields private and expose validated constructors so future
plans cannot bypass the same invariants when comparing exact sets.
Report missing and extra work separately and in deterministic order.

This reader deliberately does not parse workflow YAML or regenerate the
baseline. The checked-in files remain independent review evidence from
the old workflow rather than an expectation produced by the new planner.

Tests: standalone warning-free compilation; 12 baseline mutation tests.

*Authored by an agent, posting via joshlf's account*

gherrit-pr-id: Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Ghrxpfppzzenc5ecwz3u273gd42e4psk7 branch from 67fc58e to f277ad7 Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gt4itljw3xh6tci2mjqj4z245i6pwle2i branch from b49d72d to 55a8694 Compare August 26, 2026 01:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants